Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court adopted an amendment to MCR 8.110 to excludes cases that are stayed during an interlocutory appeal from being included in the group of cases delayed beyond the time guidelines that are required to be reported by the chief judge to the State Court Administrator. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:57 am
The court drew a distinction between Michigan law and laws of other states that had been found to support MERS foreclosures. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
I will be speaking on this subject at upcoming legal seminars for the Michigan Association for Justice, the Institute for Continuing Legal Education and the State Bar of Michigan. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
For example, University of Michigan Law School Professor Sam Bagenstos would be a great addition to the Michigan Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
The book states that no legal theorist and no positivist inquiry has been conducted on the question of judicial capacity, and this claim is false.Neglecting these literatures limits the book. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
I just read last month’s Michigan Supreme Court decision in In re McCree (Mich. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:33 am
The results of both chemical tests shall be admissible in a judicial proceeding, and will be considered with other admissible evidence in determining your innocence or guilt. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The chart below lists the enforcement rate in state courts with at least 15 judicial decisions between 1972 and 2019 and at least 10 judicial decisions between 2010 and 2020. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 9:03 am
As a judge, Reeds has contributed to revisions to the Michigan Judicial Institute’s Contempt of Court Benchbook. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
The four justice majority clearly developed “judicial amnesia” in Titan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:38 am
The Michigan Supreme Court has paved the way for other state court systems by banning all electronic communications for jurors on duty. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Right now a related story is unfolding in Michigan, where a state trial court recently held that the state legislature cannot exercise its power to “adopt” a proposed referendum (thus keeping it off the ballot pursuant to Article 2, Section 9, of the Michigan Constitution) and then gut it in the same legislative session. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:11 am
The paper is forthcoming in the Michigan State Law Review.William Howard Taft, CJ (LC)Taft played three roles on the Court during the 1920s. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:16 am
And that could lead to a 6-1 Republican-controlled Michigan Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
On November 30, 2011, the Justices of the Michigan Supreme Court issued statements denying Judge Sylvia James’ motion to disqualify all seven Justices in a Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) matter, In re Hon. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:46 am
The Court then observed that, unlike HIPAA, Michigan’s law does not provide for disclosure in judicial proceedings, does not authorize disclosure under a qualified protective order, and protects the mere existence of a physician-patient relationship from disclosure. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Because federal subject matter jurisdiction in this case was predicated solely on diversity jurisdiction, the application of the doctrine of judicial estoppel was governed by state law; thus, the Court looked to Florida’s law of judicial estoppel. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:27 am
The judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan have announced the approval, “on a pilot period basis,” of a Model Order Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information and a Rule 26(f) meet and confer checklist. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
National Pride at Work, the LGBT-interest affiliate of the AFL-CIO, joined with a group of state employees and filed suit, represented by the ACLU of Michigan, seeking a judicial declaration that existing domestic partnership benefits plans remained lawful, and that new ones could be established. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
So what counts as a judicially administrable standard in state courts might be quite different from what a federal court would need. [read post]
