Search for: "THOMAS HARMON"
Results 181 - 200
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
Similarly, the choice of words has an impact on the meaning: for example, Thomas Mann’s Der Zauberberg has been long known in Italian as La Montagna Incantata but, recently, the use of 'incantata' ('enchanted') has been questioned as a suitable translation, with 'magica' ('magical') being indicated as preferable to 'incantata'. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
It’s a well-known story that Congress smashed together two competing bills to create the CDA without trying to harmonize them. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Cox and Thomas Lee Hazen. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:22 am
El Kosheri, Reflections on the ICSID Annulment Decision Rendered in the FRAPORT/Philippines Case (996) Herbert Kronke, Principles Based Law and Rule Based Law: The Relevance of Legislative Strategies for International Commercial Arbitration (1002) Peter Mankowski, Schiedsgerichte und die Verordnungen des europäischen Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1012) Annemarie Matusche-Beckmann und Frank Spohnheimer, Überlegungen zu den Rechtsbehelfen gegen den (Nicht-)Ausschluss… [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
(Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented, and thus aren’t particularly relevant to my discussion today.)I say “didn’t seem to want to be associated” because, although Thomas’s opinion for the Court nowhere responds to, or even mentions, the concurrence, one can assume that had these three Justices agreed with the Kagan Four about the relevance and content of post-founding practice in the appropriations realm, Thomas’s opinion simply… [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:06 am
Kagan seemed focused on the question of how the justices should harmonize their general maritime law-making role with the Jones Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:58 am
Thomas Jefferson once famously warned that, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH case More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:29 pm
Justice Thomas filed a separate concurring opinion. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:42 am
Harmon, Cynthia A. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:05 am
Thomas Kleine-Brockhoff and James H. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Bernhard Horn, Gerald Fischer, Roman Trabitsch and Thomas Grechenig, An Outline of the Technical Requirements on Governmental Electronic Record Systems Derived from the European Legal Environment. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
I think there are important roles for coordination, harmonization, and multilateralism in that non-governance sense — but they are only possible if one gives up the grand dream of global constitutionalism that corrupts the present tasks with glorious dreams of the future. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm
Pointing out the tension, Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment only, writing that the only way to harmonize the Jones with Miller is to recognize that Montgomery was wrongly decided and explicitly reject it. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:20 am
Thomas Jefferson established that principle in the Declaration: “[T]o secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
Meanwhile, authors are still waiting for their proper remuneration… More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
Loudermilk), the “FCRA Liability Harmonization Act” This bill would amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to limit statutory damages in FCRA class actions to the lesser of $500,000 or one percent of the net worth of the defendant. [read post]
