Search for: "USC, LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
* Agora Financial LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
Willowood, LLC. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 10:39 am
Armslist, LLC , 1:13-cv-00607 (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:01 am
18 USC section 925 (e)(1). [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:01 pm
The two small businesses, FoodQuestTQ, LLC and Projectioneering LLC are charging that FDA took patent-protected computer automated risk management tools they developed and are now making them available on the government’s website for free. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
" Smart Systems Innovations LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by International Internet Technologies, LLC, CBM2015-00106 (PTAB July 29, 2015, Order) (Ward, APJ) [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:13 am
By Jason Rantanen CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:07 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:19 pm
Note the court's analysis is under 11 USC 541, which is property of the estate, not the exemptions and opt out provisions under 11 USC 522. [read post]
5 Apr 2006, 8:20 pm
GH, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
Piggy Paint, LLC, 1:11-cv-911 (W.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
By Eric Goldman Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Blues Destiny Records LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:08 am
Jaguar Restaurant Group LLC. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:05 pm
Claim Overlap Can be a Landmine for the Uninformed Earlier this week the Federal Circuit decided In re Cellect, LLC, affirming the PTAB’s cancellation of claims for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) over reference claims from earlier expiring patents in the same family in which differences in expiration dates were due solely to patent term adjustment (PTA). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:43 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board refusing to register the logo “JPK PARIS 75” for handbags as a trademark because it was primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive under 15 USC 1052(e)(3). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:47 am
McCalla Raymer, LLC, 13-12450, (11th Cir. [read post]
