Search for: "United Credit Recovery, LLC" Results 181 - 200 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This time at Capital One, the fifth largest credit card issuer in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Olin Corporation. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here California to Withdraw Harmful “Carbon Credits for Clearcuts” Forest Policy. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Content revolves around class action litigation in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
It did so, Justice Ginsburg’s dissent decried in a footnote, without even “acknowledging that it unsettles more than half a century of our precedent” (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595 Title VII/retaliation October 8, 2008 Argument Transcript here SCOTUSWIKI here LIIBULLETIN here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We did this frequently this past fiscal year.[12] The Commission’s public orders describe the kinds of steps that companies took to obtain this type of cooperation credit. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
The proximate cause theory, on the other hand, recognizes that restricting ‘direct loss’ to preclude recovery for any third-party obligations ‘would seem to conflict with the plain and ordinary meaning of a direct loss. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
  It should be noted, however, that the emphasis in the Restatement (Second) that the plaintiff be an intended user of the product serves to bar any recovery to bystanders injured by a product thereby making the Restatement (Third) a more favorable standard for that particular class of plaintiffs.Overall, there can be no dispute that, with the substantive differences between the two standards, the decision on which standard should be applied could have a significant impact on the… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In an unreported August 1, 2011 ruling in National Credit Union Administration v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It is important to note that if investors suffer losses on securities found to contain inaccurate or incomplete information, investors do have substantial rights of recovery against the company (including its directors and officers) and the distributors of the securities. [read post]
In response to the same expert’s conclusion that the data recovery program would be expensive, the Court ventured into unchartered waters concluding that the negative declaration failed to assess the feasibility of the data recovery program required as part of Mitigation Measure CS-CR-3. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:53 am by Monica Williamson
Jill Grant & Associates, LLC Associate Attorney. [read post]