Search for: "United States of America v. Smith" Results 181 - 200 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
And nearly one third of all federal judges in the United States are now women. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Smith weighs in on the pending cert petition in Ackles v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:10 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Yasukuni Shrine as a case study, Hiroaki Kobayashi Religion and the state in the United States at the turn of the 21st century, W. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by SOIssues
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am by Dale Carpenter
Lorie Smith, a graphic designer who holds traditional religious views about marriage, wants to create custom websites only for weddings uniting one man and one woman. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch International harmonization has always been seen as a major purpose of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
California Public Utilities Commission, 10-838, for Talk America, Inc. v Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 10-313 and Isiogu v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm by Gangemi P.C.
Merril Lynch, 13 CV 1531, Judge Baer rejected motions to compel arbitration filed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc; and Bank of America Corporation. [read post]