Search for: "Wells County Board of Zoning Appeals"
Results 181 - 200
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 2:45 pm
Nino apparently really doesn’t want federal courts turning into zoning boards. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and then worked as a private attorney until 1995. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
A county board denied the Murrs a variance, and after losing that appeal, they asserted an unconstitutional taking. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
Monterey County Board of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, the appellate court stated that an EIR can take into account the normal increase in traffic over time. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Attention is on smaller pieces of bi-partisan legislation addressing unwanted robocalls, narrowly targeted funding for “digital dead zones,” and mapping. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
County of Stanislaus, the County established a well construction permit ordinance that relied on state well development standards promulgated by the Department of Water Resources. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
County of Stanislaus, the County established a well construction permit ordinance that relied on state well development standards promulgated by the Department of Water Resources. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
In other words, DeAnda insisted, per Wilson: When the CCISD board drew attendance zones to match well-known segregated residential patterns, its members acted in their official capacity to perpetuate discrimination against the minority groups. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Kingsbury County’s zoning ordinance allows local incorporated municipalities to waive the distance requirements. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
On Appeal: The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm
The Court also examined the board’s geographic service area – “multi-county” – and noted that it was “publicly funded” but did not address what entity provided the funding. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court of appeals ruled that the condemnation could proceed based only upon the zoning of the condemnor’s property. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
[Plaintiff] attached some of those documents to its opposition letter, which [one of its board members] testified [plaintiff] authorized and to which [a plaintiff board member] contributed. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment found that the proposed construction qualified for a Class 3 exemption (new construction of small structures.) [read post]
