Search for: "William D Ing"
Results 181 - 200
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
I’m pleased to report that the First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic filed an amicus brief Saturday on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the ACLU of Virginia in Radiance Foundation v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
.), ban discrimination based on "political beliefs," defined as "opinion, whether or not manifested in speech or association, concerning the social, economic, and governmental structure of society and its institutions," "cover[ing] all political beliefs, the consideration of which is not preempted by state, federal or local law," except "political beliefs that interfere or threaten to interfere with his or her job performance. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
Some swampy "analysis" from the Washington Times VEGGIE LIBEL PLUShttp://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/4/editorial-abuse-by-the-administrative-state/ In its Oct 5, 2017 editorial, the Washington Times serves up diatribe as analysis and uses the private student loan mess -- and the CFPB's efforts to deal with it -- as an occasion to inveigh against "rogue agencies" that "routinely set aside actual duties to feed their own visions of justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
And so here we are, bringing da motherfoia-ing ruckus. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Manzie, and William Foster -- and against the superintendent of the school system, Martha Peek. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Today, as a half-century ago when the Williams Act passed, the basic principle remains that people will not go to the trouble of identifying ways in which companies can improve unless they are rewarded for that work. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
” William Boyd argues that the book “recenter[s] a set of questions that have been largely displaced and forgotten” and that it offers frameworks to understand, analyze, and think about the future of many important industries that structure our economy. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
In neither case, despite being after Williams v Parmar (our note), had the FTT addressed itself to the seriousness of the defence. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
The central purpose is to get them to think about the difference between (a) the history of political practice; (b) tradition; (c) convention; (d) legal obligations; and (e) judicially enforceable legal obligations.I would be delighted if Judge Garland--a outstanding jurist--were elevated to the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
In January 2020, Attorney General William Barr appointed Jensen to review Flynn’s prosecution—an unusual move in line with Barr’s appointment of Connecticut U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
In late 2009, … [t]he compliance supervisor at the [D]epartment, Rodney Griess, … reviewed a television commercial in which Bennie rode a horse and said he would give customers who did business with him “a hundred dollars towards the purchase of a firearm. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
Given this, I thought I’d repost my discussion of the case and of our brief. * * * North Carolina bans registered sex offenders from accessing any social media sites that allow under-18-year-olds to post; these include Facebook, Twitter and more. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
As Judge Williams of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
This was so “even though [the] provision applie[d] evenhandedly to advocates of differing viewpoints. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am
[of] New York' " and that "[d]espite New York State Civil Supreme Court extending full faith and credit to the German Court's decision and order [,] ... [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
The Agreement stipulated that the countries are to “settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations” and prohibited either country from “unilaterally alter[ing] the situation. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
” At first glance, Professor Volokh’s argument seems logical, but its logic is abstract: A::B as C::D. [read post]
