Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 3,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2018, 3:22 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 208053 (ED AR, Dec. 10, 2018) an Arkansas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 179009 (SD TX, Dec. 20, 2013), a Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:25 pm by corynne mcsherry
In May 2012, Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California ruled that APIs are not subject to copyright. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:26 am by Larry Ribstein
Last fall Guhan Subramanian, Steve Herscovici and Brian Barbetta (“SHB”) posted a paper claiming that Delaware’s antitakeover statute (Delaware GCL Section 203) was preempted by the Williams Act because it did not leave hostile bidders the “meaningful opportunity for success” required by three 1988 federal district courts which had upheld the Delaware law back in 1988. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:46 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 3050 (Jan. 8, 2018), an Illinois federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2017 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:17 pm by Kenan Farrell
Hughel of Brannon Robinson Sowers Hughel & Doss PC Defendant:     Pour House of Lincoln, Inc., Mary Olsen, William Olsen, Donald Druse Cause:   Demand for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, Federal Trademark Infringement, Cybersquatting, False Designation of Origin, False Description, Unfair Competition, Dilution by Blurring Court:    Southern District of Indiana Judge:     Judge William T. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:21 am
On March 2, 2009, in No. 08-6, District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court held that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
The district court adopted the magistrate judge's relevant proposed factual findings and rulings.Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), the Government notified Williams that it would introduce his prior firearm-possession convictions at trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although the measure it well intentioned, the federal district court was right in ruling that the measure violates principles of federal supremacy under the Constitution.The granddaddy of federal supremacy rulings is McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:09 pm
In June 2004, about a week before the Supreme Court decided Blakely, District Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts issued this remarkable 174-page opinion in US v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:03 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 161038 (WD MI, Sept. 20, 2018), a Michigan federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Since the Supreme Court's decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]