Search for: "YU v. YU" Results 181 - 200 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 7:07 am
I had a case last year, Chen v Yu, where I filed an UFTA action against the debtors' wives for $850,000. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 7:07 am
I had a case last year, Chen v Yu, where I filed an UFTA action against the debtors' wives for $850,000. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd |… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:37 am by Broc Romanek
Wal-Mart’s Impact on the “Ordinary Business Exclusion” In this podcast, Brian Breheny, Ted Yu & Hagen Ganem discuss the Third Circuit’s ruling in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:08 am by Lianjun Li, Donald Sham and Angus Yu
Our Hong Kong team comprising Lianjun Li (partner), Donald Sham (partner) and Angus Yu (associate) at Reed Smith Richards Butler LLP have been working with Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Whether a proffered excuse is reasonable is a sui generis determination to be made by the court based on all relevant factors, including the extent of the delay, whether there has been prejudice to the opposing party, whether there has been willfulness, and the strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits” (Nowakowski v Stages, 179 AD3d 822, 823 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Jinwu Yu v Hong Qin Jiang, 205 AD3d 1012, 1013). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Whether a proffered excuse is reasonable is a sui generis determination to be made by the court based on all relevant factors, including the extent of the delay, whether there has been prejudice to the opposing party, whether there has been willfulness, and the strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits” (Nowakowski v Stages, 179 AD3d 822, 823 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Jinwu Yu v Hong Qin Jiang, 205 AD3d 1012, 1013). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:58 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Miami, FL, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]