Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 19,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
United States on February 19, 2013 holding that its precedent in Michigan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 5:45 pm
No APC but does charge page fees. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:54 am
This decision concerns the appeal filed by the patent proprietor (appellant) against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke European patent No. 1 777 707.II. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
As long as the employees are temporarily teleworking as part of the firm’s business continuity plan due to circumstances related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), staff would not recommend enforcement action if the firm does not update either Item 1.F of Part 1A or Section 1.F of Schedule D in order to list the temporary teleworking addresses. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 8:40 am
Inevitable discovery also does not apply. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 8:50 am
AB 1867 expressly provided that the supplemental paid sick leave program expires when the FFCRA does. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Facebook Inc. 19-859Issues: (1) Whether Section 230(c)(1) of Title 47 of the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:05 am
On November 19, 2009, Saravanos pled guilty to First Degree Manslaughter (Penal Law 1 2 5 . 2 0 ) , and on December 15, 2009, he was sentenced to 13 years in prison and five years of post-release .parole supervision. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
Commissioner [full text] (1/19/10) TCM 2010-11, No. 17922-08 (Vasquez) 2010 WL 174107. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
” The law will enter into force July 1, 2027. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:32 am
Canada’s First Reverse Class Action Copyright Case | Guest Post: UK IPO Annual IP crime and enforcement report for 2018-2019 | There is No Such Thing as a Free Launch - CJEU Does Not Follow AG on Compensation for Wrongful PI | New CJEU referral on right of communication to the public... this time on seeding and de minimis threshold | [Guest Post] IP Education Series #1 | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Copyright in AI generated works | AG Pitruzzella advises CJEU to rule that… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
” 19 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:55 pm
Corp., No. 2011-1303, Oral Arg. at 19:30–24:55, available at http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx? [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
" In re Omniome, Inc., Serial No. 87661190 (December 19, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis).A mark is “merely descriptive” under Section 2(e)(1) "if it immediately conveys information concerning a feature, quality, or characteristic of the goods or services for which registration is sought. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:39 am
So here is the basic rule of thumb: 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 10:43 am
The grounds for revocation and invalidation are respectively Section 22(1)(a) and (b), and Section 23(1) read with Section 7(6), of the Trade Marks Act (TMA). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:00 pm
The memorandum really does not provide any clarity whatsoever. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:36 pm
19. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am
The High Court interpreted claim 1 as covering push as well as pull (or "poll") synchronization. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
