Search for: "ALTERNATIVE BRANDS, INC. " Results 201 - 220 of 899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
International Gold Star Trading Corp., Cancellation No. 92042082 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for BABUSHKA'S RECIPE for "dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt processed and marinated vegetable," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the allegedly previously-used mark BABUSHKINO for dairy products].March 9, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., Serial No. 77049126 [Section refusal of BLACK FLEECE for various… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
 It is interesting to note that after Systemax Inc. acquired the brand, the Circuit City moniker was reinstituted. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:25 am by aschwartz
 The FTC report concluded that as a result of such agreements, “brand-name pharmaceutical prices stay high, and the brand and generic share the benefits of the brand’s monopoly profits. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:47 am
Apple Inc., Opposition No. 91239006 (June 26, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 3:16 am
In re Nike, Inc., Serial Nos. 88781464 and 88781470 (July 28, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark Lebow). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 22, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated administrative and federal district court proceedings to block Tapestry, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
• Hallmark Cards, Inc is laying off between 550 and 750 employees. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
The IPKat was rather less enthused by the decision.BackgroundServier are the suppliers of the original, branded version of Perindopril, which was supplied in the UK under the brand name "Coversyl". [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:54 pm by Gordon Smith
., Inc., 673A.2d 148 (Del. 1996) in my casebook, but it's an interesting case nonetheless. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:38 am by John Stigi and Eugene Choi
 Expressing concern for diluting the corporate “brand” with that of alternative entities, the Justice interpreted Section 262 to be un-waivable and an important provision for regulating the balance of power between corporate constituencies. [read post]