Search for: "American Essentials, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 2,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 10:41 am by Sanaz Asgharzadeh
American Kennel Club, Inc., 407 F. 3d 1027, 1037 (9th Cir. 2005). [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Swiss American Bank, Ltd. (1st Cir. 2001) 274 F.3d 610, 623–624.) [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
According to a report from CDC, nearly 35 percent of Americans are considered obese. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Federal District Court dismissed an employee's [Petitioner] claim that his public employer [City] had unlawfully discriminated against him and took retaliatory actions against in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and the New York State Human Rights Law [NYSHRL].Petitioner appealed the district court's ruling to the United States Circuit Court of Appeal, challenging three conclusions of the District Court that Petitioner: [1] was not disabled after he… [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Federal District Court dismissed an employee's [Petitioner] claim that his public employer [City] had unlawfully discriminated against him and took retaliatory actions against in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and the New York State Human Rights Law [NYSHRL].Petitioner appealed the district court's ruling to the United States Circuit Court of Appeal, challenging three conclusions of the District Court that Petitioner: [1] was not disabled after he… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
To oversimplify: in some quarters at least, sympathies are becoming less American (ie, less concerned with ‘free speech’ above all else), and more European (ie, more concerned about privacy et al). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:46 am by Fraud Fighters
A former company employee reported the alleged violations against German multinational chemical and gas company, Linde AG, and its American subsidiary, Linde Engineering North America, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the error was plain, the employer could not show that it affected its substantial rights because the jury found that the employee had proven that his termination was “because of” his protected activity, which satisfied Nassar (EEOC v AC Widenhouse, Inc, June 24, 2014, Duncan, A). [read post]