Search for: "B. DAVID, Correctional Officer" Results 201 - 220 of 592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Evan Caminker
These include term limits, felon exclusions, citizenship requirements, voter-registration requirements (each of these four also governs California’s replacement election in addition to the recalled-officer exclusion), as well as age requirements, residency requirements, sore-loser laws, and impeachment-triggered bars on future office-holding. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
Harrell, Jr.Petitioner David Reier, until his termination on 7 October 1996 for asserted misconduct and poor performance, was employed as an assessor in the Carroll County office of the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT). [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Brown’s opinion starts with the assumption that a presumption of regularity supports official acts of public officers in the absence of reason to doubt their regularity. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
Luphahla then filed a motion to correct error, which the trial court denied. [read post]
20 May 2017, 7:19 am by Andrew Kent
The order by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointing Mueller states: (b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Section 3(c) vests consular officers with the “discretion” to grant waivers beyond those aliens categorically exempted by Section 3(b): Notwithstanding the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order, a consular officer, or, as appropriate, the Commissioner, U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:58 pm
Complaints  07/B/01138 & 07/B/05232 against Lambeth [link is to Word Doc] concerned delays by Lambeth in deciding on homeless applications. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
(b) If so, did his conviction and sentence amount to an “interference” with the exercise of that right? [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
I believe that the inspector general assesses these political questions in the same way, distinguishing between government officials who (a) have a political view or preference; (b) express that view or preference on government hardware or networks or while working on an investigation with political aspects; and (c) allow a political view or preference to change their investigative or related conduct. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Course isn’t correct—usual term is “program” for libraries and museums. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
This claim is contradicted by a wide range of authoritative legal sources—and were it correct, would lead to absurd consequences. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
Now is a good time to revisit one of the most fundamental points in the Bill: the dividing line between content and metadata.This is especially topical in view of reports that David Anderson Q.C. is to undertake an independent review of the operational case for bulk powers. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
Now is a good time to revisit one of the most fundamental points in the Bill: the dividing line between content and metadata.This is especially topical in view of reports that David Anderson Q.C. is to undertake an independent review of the operational case for bulk powers. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
Now is a good time to revisit one of the most fundamental points in the Bill: the dividing line between content and metadata.This is especially topical in view of reports that David Anderson Q.C. is to undertake an independent review of the operational case for bulk powers. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
However, as David Fraser points out, subjecting search engines to PIPEDA without further clarification would require them to obtain consent before including any individuals in any search results. [read post]