Search for: "Blair v. Grant" Results 201 - 220 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 4:56 am by David J. DePaolo
" These football cases are no different than the one I pointed out several posts ago about the Herman Blair case and the shameful shenanigans Erie Indemnity Co. engaged in to deny this man his benefits because his traumatic brain injury prevented him from remembering the circumstances of his fall from a ladder. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Blair Kauffman, Yale Law School; Paul Lomio, Stanford Law School; Peter W. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 11:05 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
The plaintiff sued the defendant, and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defense. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/lSu3tO9CkA -> Google says Java APIs lost copyrightability like Aspirin lost trademark protection over time http://t.co/G3o1IubgdK -> The Federal Circuit has set the stage for granting Apple an injunction against Samsung http://t.co/JjwIib4Db3 -> Protecting IP Rights http://t.co/3QglFXeUGW -> Dennis Blair and Jon Huntsman: Protect U.S. intellectual property rights http://t.co/2DEVYShVvW -> Google Reader Woes Update http://t.co/ebVryYkYFs -> Tech Law… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
  The witness statement of Jemima Khan and second supplement witness statement of Hugh Grant were taken as read. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Pursuant to the noncompliance provisions of a settlement agreement, the Board found that the allegations of the compliance specification are true, granted the General Counsel's motion for summary judgment, concluded that the net backpay due discriminatee Jeff Blair is as stated in the compliance specification, and ordered the Respondent to make Blair whole by paying him $13,090. [read post]