Search for: "Bui v. USA" Results 201 - 220 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am by Bexis
”  Id. at *7 (quoting Davis, with our emphasis).Reliance, not causation.In fact, subsequent decisions have criticized whether Davis gave “fair consideration” to the causation element of FDUTPA (including a case we worked on, Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:20 am by Jennifer Canfield
Unlike the plaintiffs in Clapper v Amnesty Int’l, USA, 133 S.Ct. 1138 (2013) and Reilly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:20 am by Jennifer Canfield
Unlike the plaintiffs in Clapper v Amnesty Int’l, USA, 133 S.Ct. 1138 (2013) and Reilly v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
For the following reasons we AFFIRM the decision of the district court. 08a0099p.06 USA v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Eric Posner weighs in on Monday’s decision in Apple v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by war
(c) When did you last buy a pair of sports shoes? [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
First, it did not prove that even EU IP lawyers would disregard the registration of design patents in the USA. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]