Search for: "City of Hialeah" Results 201 - 219 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 525 (1993) (characterizing Islam as a religion protected by the First Amendment); Wallace v. [read post]
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today is the Symposium in Honor of Professor Sherry Colb, hosted by Rutgers School of Law in Newark and co-sponsored by the Cornell Law Review. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
City of Hialeah (Santeria plaintiffs seeking to engage in animal sacrifice); Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by David Urban
Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism are typically cited as the major religions of the world, although there are many others that have tens of millions of adherents or more. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Hialeah (1993) (stating that "religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of East Cleveland (1977) (plurality opinion, but cited favorably by later majority opinions) (recognizing such a right, even outside the parent-child context).) [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Hialeah (1993), which held that laws that are targeted at religious exercise (and aren't neutral and generally applicable) are unconstitutional unless they pass strict scrutiny. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
At oral argument two weeks ago in Masterpiece Cakeshop, the Justices did not appear to be taken with any of the unconvincing distinctions that the bakery’s counsel and the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 3:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Note that the decision is not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's holding in Dobbs, though it may of course still be overturned on appeal on other grounds.] [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]