Search for: "Clark v. No Named Defendant" Results 201 - 220 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have raised or… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
In a civil suit filed in Clark County District Court last month, Mr. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
The defendant in State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
     The removal of the own name defence and fundamental rights – Sky v SkyKickSky v SkyKick [2017] EWHC 1769 (Ch) (July 2017)Most trade mark lawyers know Sky’s reputation for pursuing action against anyone using the word SKY in their name, even SKYPE. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am by Neil Wilkof
In other words, the burden of proof of misuse or likelihood of misuse now falls on the defendant. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
A katpat to Roy Crozier (of the victorious Clarke Willmott LLP) for his prompting in getting this note up and running. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:23 am by PaulKostro
Where the order involves a procedural violation, additional considerations are implicated, namely, “‘[t]he defendant’s right to have the plaintiff comply with procedural rules[, which] conflicts with the plaintiff’s right to an adjudication of the controversy on the merits. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am by SHG
Cato’s crim law honcho Clark Neily argues vehemently for the return of the criminal trial. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cummins is the managing partner of the Clarks Summit, PA law firm of Cummins Law. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:29 am
As to what Cole did to get himself charged with these crimes, it seems he and Takara Robinson were passing bad checks at a Marathon station: "The Marathon station employees became suspicious of Takara Robinson's check because it matched bad checks they received in the past; however, those checks bore the name `David Clark.' As they were stalling Robinson and [Cole], the Marathon station employees identified [Cole] as the person who previously presented the checks… [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Doctor Rachel Clarke reported the tweet to the police and has threatened to sue Moran for defamation. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:04 pm
Kunz testified that she had received bills from a facility named Renal Care Group for her dialysis treatments. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
Clark (1985) 38 Cal.3d 355 (California Supreme Court)). [read post]