Search for: "Doe 1-20"
Results 201 - 220
of 27,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
United States, 22-5345Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge for which the defendant was acquitted by a jury; and (2) whether it violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment for the district court to sentence Gary Karr based on a 20-year-old, out-of-court statement, never subjected to cross-examination, made by the more-culpable but now-deceased… [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 4:26 pm
January 20, 2012: stormed Kim's place in Auckland. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am
The Board does not agree with this finding.2.2 The Board considers at least the following features of claim 1 to be o [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 7:39 am
” Id. at *1-2. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:18 am
Does 1-1000, No. 10 C 5604, Slip Op. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm
“Relocation Assistance Act,” P.L.1971, c. 362 (C.20:4-1 et seq.). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:46 am
Your choice does matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:14 am
How does the election of a Republican House, a Republican Senate, and President-Elect Donald Trump change what employers should be doing as we speed towards the December 1 deadline? [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am
The BBC had made submissions on this point, based on the case of Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd [1982] 1 QB 1. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Of course a home exercise program is important, but only if the injured worker (1) actually does it at home and (2) does it as often as they are supposed to. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:03 pm
Does your company employ a Charlie Sheen? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:21 am
") SC18383 Concurrence SC18383 Concurrence SC18383 Concurrence Published: 1/20/2011 11:43 AM [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:27 am
2-20-2008 Ohio:The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that, because a 2003 state law barring certain sex offenders from residing within 1,000 feet of a school does not expressly provide that its provisions apply retrospectively, the statute does not apply to an offender who bought his home and committed his crime before the law took effect. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:47 pm
It does not constitute legal advice, and is not intented to create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:38 pm
KSR was invoked as to claim 1:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 4:49 pm
At the same time, the new statute doe snot address duration of the maintenance and length of the marriage of the parties. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:27 am
”[6] Continue reading → The post What is the “trial penalty” in federal criminal cases and does it mean I shouldn’t take my case to trial? [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
Under a new California law effective January 1, 2009. it is now illegal write, send, or read a "text-based communication" while driving. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:55 am
On 31 January 2020, the FCA published Policy Statement 20/1: Mortgage advice and selling standards: feedback to CP19/17 and final rules (PS20/1). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Restoring the name of a candidate to an eligible list, even one improperly earlier removed from the list, does not obviate the application of the so-called Rule of Three, Civil Service Law §61(1). [read post]
