Search for: "Does 1 - 49"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 5:40 am
App. 1, 15, 82 A.3d 630 (2013). [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:27 am
This sounds like a classic “sweetheart” deal and does not pass the smell test. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 5:15 pm
It is OK to follow such "polls" as long as one does not take them seriously. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 10:20 am
Editor’s Note: This post, originally published at 11:49 a.m., was expanded at 1:26 p.m. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
Barone, 913 F.2d at 49. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:38 am
Goodno, 567 F.3d 944, 948-49 (8th Cir. 2009). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:42 am
App. 3d 1071, 1076, 418 N.E.2d 6, 49 Ill. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:48 pm
Casey, 49, was booked in St. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:00 pm
H.B. 49) was signed into law by Governor Kasich on June 30, 2017, undoubtedly with much effort and compromise from Ohio’s legislatures who bridged a massive budget deficit, estimated to be as much as $1 billion. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020 Alabama 49 49 50 50 0 Alaska 5 5 5 5 0 Arizona 44 44 40 40 0 Arkansas 46 46 45 46 -1 California 41 40 46 45 1 Colorado 37 37 37 37 0 Connecticut 31 30 30 26 4 Delaware 1 1 2 2 0 Florida 29 31 22 23 -1 Georgia 34 29 29 29 0 Hawaii 26 26 33 30 3 Idaho 15 16 12 12 0 Illinois 27 27 35 33 2 Indiana 9 9 13 20 -7 Iowa 20 20 17 15 2 Kansas 28 28 27 38 -11 Kentucky 13 15 18 14… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
1. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:02 am
" What does it mean to be "final"? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:20 pm
Although the agreement stated (1) that the defendant/prime contractor had agreed “to execute a subcontracting agreement to provide [Cyberlock] 49% of the prime contract for the work anticipated to be performed by [Cyberlock]” and that, upon award of a prime contract, the defendant/prime contractor “will perform 51% of the scope of work with [Cyberlock] performing 49%,” the court found the teaming agreement to be unenforceable. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:18 am
Consistent with current practice, non-contractor employers with 1-99 employees and federal contractors with 1-49 employees will not be required to file the EEO-1 Report. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
[See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. 40103(a)(1) re: “Sovereignty and the Right of Public Transit – (1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:50 pm
Bill C-49 would if passed in its present form: 1. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Alex, 2017 SCC 37 (36771) When ss. 258(1)(c) and 258(1)(g) are analyzed in accordance with modern principles of statutory interpretation, the Crown need not prove the demand was lawful in order to take advantage of statutory “shortcuts”; if sample taking is subjected to Charter scrutiny, and evidence of the breath test results found to be inadmissible by virtue of ss. 8 and 24(2), that ends the matter, and resort to the evidentiary shortcuts a non-issue. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
State, 84 P.3d 38, 48-49 (Mont. 2004); Willoya v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:28 am
The Act, which is effective October 1, 2008 is not found in Connecticut's penal code per se, but is found with Connecticut's discrimination statutes. [read post]
