Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 201 - 220 of 12,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm by LindaMBeale
And Rand Paul and Jim DeMint are defending these upstanding members of the 1 percent by carrying water for banks who want to avoid the paperwork costs involved in ferreting out the tax dodgers. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by Steve Hall
Texas legislative leaders rolled out the draft budget for the two year period beginning September 1, 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 9:39 am
But the state argued (1) that because McAdam might not yet have been decided if Mr. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an important June 27, 2013, the Second Circuit issued an important decision on this question, holding that the tolling doctrine does not apply to three-year statue of repose under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
., Oct. 27, 2015), a Missouri appeals court in a 2-1 decision held that the Missouri Human Rights Act does not bar employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:45 pm by Allan Blutstein
 How does OGIS’s compliance work? [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court granted review on April 27, and the issues presented are listed as follows: (1) May a court rely on non-legislative expressions of public policy to overturn an arbitration award on illegality grounds? [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:56 pm by Sme
., March 1, 2018) (affirming judgment in favor of Quiktrip on Starr's Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act:  Starr did not show any reversible error. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 11:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly,we vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/15-1246.Opinion.1-27-2016.1.PDF [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 2:46 pm by Sme
., August 27, 2017) (affirming dismissal of Villecco's employment discrimination claim for failure to prosecute his claim, and subsequent denial of FRCP 60(b) motion for relief)*Webster v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court granted review on April 27, and the issues presented are listed as follows: (1) May a court rely on non-legislative expressions of public policy to overturn an arbitration award on illegality grounds? [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:20 am by Docket Navigator
Cir. 2016)] requires the Board to 'strike the proper balance between (1) an invention of general usage that could also be used in the administration of a financial service and (2) an invention that is used in administration of a financial service but that could also be used for non-financial purposes.' Petitioner, however, does not quote anything in Unwired Planet for this proposition, which appears to contradict the Federal Circuit’s direction that covered business… [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
"  To the extent that the building is used for educational activities subsidized by the Spanish government, the religious order is not engaged "economic activity" and the EU Treaty does not bar a tax exemption. [read post]