Search for: "Does 1-36" Results 201 - 220 of 5,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
State, 790 S.W.2d 334, 335-36 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:45 pm by Paul A. Prados
  Below are three maps reflecting a comparison of the redistricting lines for the five least compact and contiguous districts.For each map:The blue lines reflect the conference plan vetoed by the Governor.The green lines represent the current compromise plan.When the lines are the same the blue lines cover the green lines.For Districts 1, 2, and 3. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:15 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Admission of documents (36), (37) and (38)3.1 Documents (36) and (37) were filed with the statement of grounds of appeal in direct response to the opposition division's decision revoking the patent. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), does not apply to probate revocation hearings. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
’” Univ. of Kentucky v. 40-0, LLC, 2021 USPQ2d 253, at *36 (quoting Eagle Crest, 96 USPQ2d at 1230). [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 8:52 am by Giles Peaker
But, firstly the wording of para 3 overall unclear here – it is para 36(3)(b) that ends with an ‘and’, so would be the logical back reference of ‘so checked’ in 36(3)(c), while para 36(3)(a) – the 12 monthly requirement – does not end with an ‘and’. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:23 am by Michael Geist
The 36 articles generated a total of 5668 public engagements (notably 1/3 of those engagements came from a single article on electricity pricing) with 3712 of those coming from Toronto Star posts. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
McLaren, P.C. v Massand Eng’g, L.S., P.C., 51 AD3d 878, 878; Giarratano v Silver, 46 AD3d 1053, 1055; Booth v Kriegel, 36 AD3d 312, 314; Mitschele v Schultz, 36 AD3d 249, 253). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In decision T 254/93 it was decided that the mere explanation of an effect obtained when using a compound in a known composition, even if the effect was not known to be due to this compound in the known composition, cannot confer novelty to a known process if the skilled person was already aware of the occurrence of the desired effect (see headnote 2 and point [4.8] of the reasons).[36] Thus the subject-matter of claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 54; the… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification Jula Hughes & Philip Bryden 36:1 Dalhousie Law Journal (2013) 171-192 Introduction The “reasonable apprehension of bias” test for judicial disqualification has been a fixture of Canadian law for many years, at a minimum since its formulation in the National Energy Board case in 1978.[1] By that time, the Supreme Court of Canada was able… [read post]