Search for: "Does 1-53"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
It reads in pertinent part, 4511.19(D)(1)(b). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:09 pm
On February 1[1], the following Monday, we couldn't find her. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
” Alleging that the Employer’s determination was arbitrary, capricious and made in bad faith, Petitioner argued that:(1) he should have been afforded the protections mandated by Civil Service Law Section 75, and as outlined in Article 33 of the Collective Agreements between the State of New York and the New York State Civil Service Employees Association; (2) while minimum qualifications of employment may not rise to acts of misconduct that would invoke disciplinary procedures… [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 8:19 am
Generally speaking, Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 does not require a term to be positive or neutral in order to have a descriptive character. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:27 am
How Does Aggravated Assault and Battery Differ from Simple Charges? [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
Opponents of Houston’s Proposition 1 preyed on unfounded fears of trans women to kill the city’s equal rights ordinance. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
Porch, 53 N.J. 167, 173 (1969). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the FOIA 2000, s 53, does not permit the Attorney General to override the decision of a judicial tribunal or Court by issuing a certificate merely because he, considering the same facts and arguments, takes a different view from that taken by the tribunal or Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
[1] Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation (DC Cir, 8 July 2011) slip op, page 53 (Rogers J) [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:43 pm
“A 53 percent majority already does so in the West, according to the survey. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:36 am
Co., 53 S.W.3d 826 (Tex.App. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:46 am
Indeed, Article 53 indicates that the Prosecutor has the discretion not to investigate a referred situation: 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 pm
Claim 1 reads as follows. 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:38 pm
" Id. at 53:11-23. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm
App. 48, 53-54 (1914) “While it may be true there is no right of property in a dead body, in the ordinary sense, it is also true that the nearest relatives of the deceased are and have been in all ages, so far as known, except under ecclesiastical law, recognized as legally entitled to its custody, to lay it away in burial. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
Both would face a tax of $1 53 cents. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 10:25 am
Pompidou argues that Article 52 (1) EPC does not enshrine a general principle of the narrow interpretation of exclusions from patentability (emphasis added, AHH). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:47 am
Moreover, a clamping connection does not necessarily require a corresponding ridge, nor does it necessarily define a specific site or seat. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
Three questions had been referred to the Enlarged Board by interlocutory decision T 1319/04.The claim that triggered the question read as follows:1. [read post]
