Search for: "Does 1-68" Results 201 - 220 of 2,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 10:12 pm
 This rule does away with the cumbersome ‘will say’ requirement of Rule 68 and allows 2 hour examinations for discovery. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Because the Board failed to meetthat burden here, and because the only permissible findingthat can be drawn from Rasmussen is that it does notdisclose the claim limitation at issue, we reverse theBoard’s anticipation determination with respect to Rasmussenas to appealed claims 1–3 and 5–8. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:32 am by David DePaolo
Tennessee is making workers' compensation history.I'm not sure it's going to be history that will be revered, or reviled, however.The Tennessee House of Representatives on Thursday voted 68-24 along party lines to approve Senate Bill 200 Thursday morning and sent the bill back to the Senate, which approved an earlier version of the bill 28-2 on April 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 7:41 pm
If the Court ultimately approves a lower amount of remuneration, then the personal representative or trustee must repay the difference (section 68). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:52 am by Ron Miller
Penney attempted to avoid an FLSA collective action by making Rule 68 offers of judgment to the named plaintiffs in the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:20 am by emagraken
One can only hope for some clarity on this issue by possible amendments to Rule 9-1(5). [68]         In the meantime, I conclude that I have the discretion under Rule 9-1(5)(d) to award the defendant his costs, including disbursements. [69]         I award such costs, which will include disbursements, in favour of Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:15 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
In her dissent, the honorable Justice Hunstein artfully explained why this statute does in fact violate our constitutional access to the courts as follows: "OCGA § 9-11-68(b)(1) penalizes plaintiffs with meritorious causes of action for an impossiblity, namely, their failure to see into the future so as to calculate the precise amount a factfinder may award them for the damages they reasonably believed they sustained at the hands of the defendants...No party… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 5:01 am
This does not, for Thomas, end the debate because the evidence is also insufficient to show that the states were not aware of the intent to incorporate. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  CAAF’s order explains: Upon further consideration of the certified issue (69 M.J. 198), we note that because of an ambiguity in this Court’s order of October 28, 2009 (68 M.J. 236), where we set aside the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, but ordered a new review of only Issue II, the Court of Criminal Appeals, in its subsequent decision of June 11, 2010, acted on the findings with respect to Specifications 1, 2, and 3 of Charge… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:49 am by Carina van Vuuren
In terms of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981, a contract of alienation of land must be in writing and signed by the parties or by their agents on their written authority. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, ALJ Rogers determined that the accused Nintendo products do not infringe (1) claims 16, 27-32, 44, 57, 68, and 84 of the ‘151 patent, and (2) claims 2, 4, 11, and 14 of the ‘268 patent. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:20 am
Kandakasi J had further regard to the UNHCR’s guidelines on the detention of asylum seekers (Namah at [66]), PNG’s obligations under the Refugees Convention(at [67]), and the UNHCR’s condemnation of the conditions in which asylum seekers on Manus Island are detained (at [68]). [read post]