Search for: "Does 1-75"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2016, 11:23 am
Accordingly, an employee who does not wish to continue employment with a successor employer may resign from employment but will have no recourse against the vendor or the purchaser, subject to specific undertakings in the employment agreement. [1] 2016 QCCA 75. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:50 am
Under the fiction, the farmer does not "sell" raw milk, but "sells" a portion of the cow. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
A board seeking the higher standard of review through Rule 75 must conduct itself in the same elevated manner as a court does. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
§240 [1-b]; F.C.A. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm
(The agency plans to use $75 million in convertible notes to help finance the company). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
La Corte sostuvo que:1. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:15 am
#Sandtondiscussion— goldenrail (@Ivoryblossum) June 1, 2015Check out this very informative summary of the case Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting which #sandtondiscussion https://t.co/uR2F8FNGBd— Yongz (@EricMashida) June 1, 2015 [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
By Austin Max Scherer[1] On June 7, the Justice Department seized much of the ransom that a major U.S. pipeline operator had paid last month to a Russian hacking collective.[2] This resulted from investigators tracing more than 75 Bitcoins worth as the money moved through a “maze” of at least 23 different electronic accounts belonging to DarkSide, the hacking group.[3] DarkSide operated by providing ransomware to affiliates. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
By Austin Max Scherer[1] On June 7, the Justice Department seized much of the ransom that a major U.S. pipeline operator had paid last month to a Russian hacking collective.[2] This resulted from investigators tracing more than 75 Bitcoins worth as the money moved through a “maze” of at least 23 different electronic accounts belonging to DarkSide, the hacking group.[3] DarkSide operated by providing ransomware to affiliates. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
App. 4th 1294, 75 Cal. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:44 pm
The fact that waste water escapes from a sewerage network does not affect its character as ‘waste' within the meaning of Directive 75/442. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
Nevertheless, because there are over 1900 discrimination cases filed each year, what does it really mean that the CHRO found "reasonable cause" in just 75 cases? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:03 am
Does the wife have grounds for an annulment, if the husband admits to (1) having "fathered" at least 75 children [and possibly as many 140] through premarital artificial insemination and (2) not having informed the wife before their marriage ? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:59 pm
Nevertheless, the USDA budget is more than 75% focused on food and nutrition programs, and a diminished amount will be focused on farmers in terms of a safety net. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:23 am
So, again, understanding seven can be binding on the Court only if qualifies as a subsequent agreement under Article 31 of the VCLT — and given that it was adopted by less than 75% of the States Parties, it obviously does not. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
(c)(1)). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm
This means that the Crown prosecutor does not have an election in prosecuting an individual, either summarily or by indictment. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:57 pm
Payments were made at the 75 percentile. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the… [read post]
