Search for: "EVALUATION & TESTING ASSOCIATES, INC." Results 201 - 220 of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
. :: Case No. 1:14-cv-879AbbVie Inc., and :Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ::Defendants. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Ben Luftman
These tests are designed to evaluate balance, coordination, and the ability to follow instructions. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm by Tom Lamb
The FDA also obtained product samples from the company and the samples are undergoing testing. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:17 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The president of the Construction Association of Nova Scotia, Carol MacCulloch, says the changes allow new technology to be evaluated and incorporated into buildings and systems more quickly. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The UP mark includes the language “Highest Standard” and “Certified*Lab Tested*Sensory Evaluated. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 2:21 am
Developed by the Second Circuit in its opinion in Computer Associates Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:17 pm
Patricia Collantes was fined $8,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any principal capacity in relation to findings that while acting as Operating Manager at Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in Palo Alto, California, Ms. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:43 am by Joe Koncelik
The Sixth Circuit reversed an EPA determination that a natural gas plant and associated wells were one “source” for purposes of Clean Air Act permitting. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
For example, the rule would require a laboratory to report a “confirmed case” based merely on a test result. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Aside from the business consequences of threatening your own potential customers, an IP owner may want to evaluate the positives regarding cease and desist letters, and balance this against the risks associated with more strongly worded letters. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:07 am by Sean Wajert
  Defendant contended that the plaintiff's physician was a learned intermediary and stood in the best position to evaluate and to warn the plaintiff of any risks associated with reducing the pacemaker's function and, as a result, it was not their obligation to warn the plaintiff. [read post]