Search for: "FAMILIES MATTER INC" Results 201 - 220 of 4,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 9:56 am
The delay of more than four months in notifying the defendant of the claim was unreasonable as a matter of law (see Evangelos Car Wash, Inc. v Utica First Ins. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:01 pm
" And as to the assertion that "an attorney's family matters caused delay," there was no explanation as to why others in the same law firm could not have carried on.The CAFC therefore held that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to re-open. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:15 am
Compounding matters for the Van-Hoy family, John's beloved grandfather passed away on April 27th, 2011. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:08 am by Dean Freeman
As far as damages, this woman was essential not only to her family’s financial and emotional well-being, but to her community. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Authority of the arbitrator to fashion a remedy affecting a party found to have violated the terms of the collective bargaining agreement Matter of Merrick Union Free School Dist. v Merrick Faculty Assn., Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 06128, Appellate Division, Second Department In this CPLR Article 75 action the Merrick Faculty Association, Inc. appealed an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County that granted the school district’s petition seeking to vacate the… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:02 am by Dan Bressler
” For more detail on the substance of the matter, see: “Family battle for control of Rogers lands in B.C. court. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:01 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Rotterdam Ventures, Inc. v Town Bd. of the Town of Rotterdam, the Court found the property in question had been used as a multifamily residential property for the period in question and the rezoning was consistent with the transitional nature of the site between an industrial use and a residential neighborhood. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm by Robin E. Shea
The plaintiff in the case -- surprisingly -- was the employer (see explanation below), Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Harde-Ralls Pontiac, Inc., 891 S.W.2d 905, 907 (Tenn. 1994), the family purpose doctrine is no longer valid. [read post]