Search for: "Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. " Results 201 - 220 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am by Tejinder Singh
In 2013, he wrote a concurring opinion in Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the non-exempt employee plaintiffs argued that the binding arbitration agreements they entered into with their employer were unenforceable under state law. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., articulated a substantial burden standard “much easier to satisfy” than that used in another RLUIPA case, Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Center, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Hobby Lobby Stores, the Court had ruled that the government may not enforce that mandate against a family-0wned (“closely held”) for-profit business, when the family members objected for religious reasons to providing birth-control services to their female employees. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
  First, it was Wal Mart, then Hobby Lobby, and now it is Family Dollar’s turn. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that a company whose owners opposed contraception on religious grounds did not have to provide its employees insurance that covered contraception. [read post]
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., No. 17-CV-00881-GPC-BLM, 2017 WL 4358146, at *9 (S.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), the Supreme Court held that the exemption must be extended to closely-held for-profit corporations with sincere religious objections to the provision of contraceptive coverage so that their religious beliefs were not substantially burdened under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). [read post]