Search for: "ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS"
Results 201 - 220
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 7:55 am
Icon Health & Fitness (2014) (fee-shifting under § 285 sits within the discretion of the district courts based upon a totality of the circumstances rather than a rigid framework involving both subjectively and objectively bad behavior.) [4] MedImmune v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), which was a patent case, should guide district courts when facing attorney fee applications under the Lanham Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 10:08 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S.), which the Court has set for hearing on February 26, 2014. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
With another store apparently on the horizon in Brooklyn, perhaps cease and desist letters are in the mail, for Dumb Starbucks to contemplate in their Los Feliz store, newly-closed under Health Code violations." [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:06 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), the Supreme Court was asked to interpret the language allowing attorneys fees to be awarded in “exceptional” patent cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
Icon Health & Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:27 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
It is not smart strategy to use an ingredient that can be perceived as harmful to health, particularly when your target consumer is athletic and health conscious. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in “exceptional cases,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:58 am
Would you say that the fitness equipment pictured below – a water resistance rowing machine called WaterRower, originally created between 1985 and 1987 by former professional US rower John Duke and the subject of a now expired US patent – could be protected by copyright? [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm
(collecting cases); Icon Health & Fitness,Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (2014), a virtually unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the rigid framework crafted by the Federal Circuit to authorize the awarding of attorneys fees was inconsistent with the statutory text and that district courts should be given broad discretion to award attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
