Search for: "Justice John Paul Stevens" Results 201 - 220 of 2,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2020, 7:32 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Since Justice Antonin Scalia was not available to be on the podcast, we reached out to Northwestern Law School’s John Paul Steven’s Professor of Law, Andrew Koppelman, and Jackson Walker Labor & Employment attorney, Sara Harris, to fill in. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
The more liberal justices have more negative numbers and include Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan as well as Justices David Souter and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 5:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Even the author of that ruling, the late Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, admitted that he made a serious error in his majority opinion for the Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John’s Episcopal Church, where he posed stern-faced, holding up a Bible. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins
Our first research project grew out of personal hallway conversations and emails that we exchanged in the year between Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court in August of 2009 and Justice Elena Kagan’s nomination and confirmation in 2010. [read post]
29 May 2020, 8:59 am by Christine Corcos
Here is the abstract.In the days following Justice John Paul Stevens’s death last year, numerous tributes and remembrances immediately poured forth. [read post]
29 May 2020, 8:59 am
Here is the abstract.In the days following Justice John Paul Stevens’s death last year, numerous tributes and remembrances immediately poured forth. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Sonja West, University of Georgia School of Law, and Dahlia Lithwick, Senior Editor, Slate, have posted The Paradox of Justice John Paul Stevens, which appears in the Northwestern University Law 114 (2020): 1849-1857:Justice John Paul Stevens (LC)In the days following Justice John Paul Stevens’s death last year, numerous tributes and remembrances immediately poured forth. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Rodger Citron suggests that the critical question is “which Chief Justice John Roberts will show up. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While Some Fear a Conflict of Interest, Many Are Desperate for Cash Greenwich Times – Paul Fahri (Washington Post) | Published: 4/29/2020 As advertising has collapsed, a handful of news organizations have taken the once unthinkable step of turning to the government for a lifeline. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
City of New York, New York, it “looks like we have a Whitehouse Effect in which Chief Justice John Roberts can be moved by political threats to judicial independence. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:36 am by Andrew Koppelman
I was a law student when I first became aware that there was something special about Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Howard Bashman
Yesterday would have been Justice John Paul Stevens’ 100th birthday: To mark the occasion, the Northwestern University Law Review posted online the contents of a special issue titled “In Memoriam: Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm by Derek T. Muller
It's the kind of test where Judge Mark Walker in Florida would find that it's a "severe" burden on voting rights if the Republican candidate is listed first on the ballot when a Republican is governor; and where Justice John Paul Stevens would find a photo identification law in Indiana to be a "limited" burden on voters in a record with "no evidence of any" in-person voter "fraud actually occurring in Indiana at any… [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
In 2004, liberal Justice John Paul Stevens joined with conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that what constitutes an invasion and whether it justifies habeas suspension “are questions for Congress rather than” the courts to decide.Would locking down the nation and suspending habeas corpus in response to COVID-19 be an extreme measure? [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
And that same advocacy made clear what overarching themes and points of emphasis prompted the justices to rule the way they did. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm
” Dissenting Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, “Sobriety checkpoints are elaborate and disquieting, publicity stunts. [read post]