Search for: "Knight v. Knight" Results 201 - 220 of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2017, 1:12 pm by Anthony McCain
Gene Quinn: SCOTUS Reverses Federal Circuit In TC Heartland Shawn Knight: Apple And Nokia Settle Intellectual Property Dispute Vera Ranieri: No Evidence That “Stronger” Patents Will Mean More Innovation Donald Zuhn: Biscotti v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:25 am by Anna Salvatore
Letter Re US v John Bolton (PDF)Letter Re US v John Bolton (Text) [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Knight v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Well done, LexisNexis Butterworths, for unearthing Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch), an obscure ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in the Chancery Division yesterday on a neat little passing-off point.Knight, a British citizen who lived in Australia, published three books in the UK between 1991 and 1996; each had the word 'Mythbusters' in its title. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Knight II on Cato Institute amicus brief in Worman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 6:11 pm
In re Gunn GP LLC, Serial No. 78497204 (October 30, 2006) [not citable].The reader will recall that in Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant, Justin… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant, Justin… [read post]