Search for: "Refunds Now, Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
JTH Tax, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:38 pm
Now that I'm done throwing around numbers, how should we interpret Cam Newton's salary? [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:31 pm
Tobacos de Wilson, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:38 pm
Now that I'm done throwing around numbers, how should we interpret Cam Newton's salary? [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:42 am
Refunds on appeal fees are provided for in an amendment to Rule 103 EPC. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:41 am
Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
Facebook, Inc., No. 11 Civ 918(RJH), 2012 WL 183896 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 10:29 pm
The reply denies the appeal and informs Octathrope that they are forever barred from the Ad-sense program and that all money for the last month would be refunded to the advertisers. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:14 am
Plaintiff paid the taxes under protest and now seeks a refund. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:21 am
Congress is now considering legislation that would ban cadmium from children's jewelry and toys. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
You can enter one or both promotions between now and April 15, 2011, for a chance to win. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:23 am
AdoreMe agreed to pay $1.3 million to refund eligible consumers alongside an injunction on misleading marketing. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:15 pm
Kellogg is conducting an investigation into what substance on the liners is causing the illnesses and is giving refunds to customers in the meantime. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:23 am
AdoreMe agreed to pay $1.3 million to refund eligible consumers alongside an injunction on misleading marketing. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Curtis v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-06079 (N.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
The Court of International Trade has determined the classification of plastic Smart Covers for iPads in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
You have non-refundable tickets to fly to your dream all-inclusive resort. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:07 pm
For example, there is no indication that the FTC believes consumers overpaid for the TVs at issue or that they are due refunds or payments in light of the practices alleged, or that any refunds will be paid to consumers. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Lee, No. 15-955 (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers; two amici now filed in support); same question presented by Cooper in Cooper v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
According to the Privacy Rule, if a covered entity or business associate successfully undertook an effort to identify the subject of de-identified information it maintained, the health information now related to a specific individual would again be protected by the Privacy Rule, as it would meet the definition of PHI. [read post]
