Search for: "SHARP CORPORATION"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2020, 7:04 am
Posted by Peter Reilly (FTI Consulting) and Aniel Mahabier (CGLytics), on Saturday, March 28, 2020 Editor's Note: Peter Reilly is Senior Director, Corporate Governance at FTI Consulting and Aniel Mahabier is CEO of CGLytics. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 7:03 pm
May be why those publications always look pretty sharp. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian A. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:59 am
Companies that do business in New Jersey have seen a sharp spike in class actions alleging their Web sites violate the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act, 56 N.J.S.A. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:31 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian A. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:59 am
Companies that do business in New Jersey have seen a sharp spike in class actions alleging their Web sites violate the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act, 56 N.J.S.A. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:19 am
., Allen Sharp, Judge), a 10-page opinion, Judge Sykes writes:This appeal presents the question whether a claim for fraudulent inducement of a contract is subject to the contract's forum-selection clause, and if so, whether the district court correctly dismissed this suit for improper venue. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:31 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian A. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian A. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:31 am
As part of the deal, Merck has also agreed to enter into an expansive corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services to monitor its conduct. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
However, sometimes this abstract thinking takes a sharp turn into the metaphysical, if not the absurd. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The statute of limitations dictates how much time is available for an individual to pursue a claim against another individual, corporation, or other entity. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
(“Samsungâ€) alleging violation of Section 337 by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation (“SECâ€), and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 11:03 am
Notable Events of the Week: “The rapid spread of the omicron variant could be a major setback for efforts to reverse sharp inequality in the accessibility of effective coronavirus vaccines around the world, public health experts warn. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am
Sharp Elecs. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:28 am
These actions are a sharp departure from precedent, both in their severity and their public nature. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:16 am
He, along with his appointed Director of Corporation Finance, Bill Hinman, laments the sharp decline in initial public offerings (IPOs) over the last several decades, and point to that trend as evidence of a lack of opportunities for everyday investors to benefit from investments in growth-stage companies. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
In sharp contrast, in January the Ford Motor Company reported a $12.7 billion loss for 2006, the biggest in its 103 year history, topping a $7.39 billion loss in 1992. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:36 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Sharp Corporation of Japan, Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey, and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. of San Diego, California as respondents in this investigation. [read post]