Search for: "SMITH v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The second aspect considers the range of non-legal normative governance rules that might apply. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
I think it’s important to have U.S. standards to which U.S. issuers can point. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm
" As the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 869 (1995) DePyper v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, et al., 2009 WL 73274 (N.D.Ill. 03/16/09). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
This is the principle that anchors our report and informs our recommendations to the government. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Served as the Prevention Manager for the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
George v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
