Search for: "Sears Holding Corp."
Results 201 - 220
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
What if one holds that the contract was procured by barratry and is void, and the other one reaches the opposite conclusion? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied) for “holding that a summary-judgment movant was not required to prove the requisites for accelerating a note because there was no specific denial of conditions precedent i [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 4:48 am
Army/Marine Corps COIN Manual, an approach many have compared to CVE—frames the U.S. and global move to CVE as motivated by “learning” from “more than a decade since the searing experience of 9/11. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
By postponing payments, insurance companies can hold money longer and make more on their investments-- and often wear down clients to the point of dropping a challenge. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
By postponing payments, insurance companies can hold money longer and make more on their investments-- and often wear down clients to the point of dropping a challenge. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
By postponing payments, insurance companies can hold money longer and make more on their investments-- and often wear down clients to the point of dropping a challenge. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
United States, in which the five conservatives reunited in a 5–4 majority holding that “money compensation” does not include employee stock options. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Thus, the Operating Engineers decision that "you can't do this" will inure to the benefit of product manufacturers of all sorts defending against consumer fraud claims - much better than a mere extraterritoriality decision not addressing the merits of the claims would have been.And this holding is ironclad. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Graffiti on the bathroom wall in the building that housed my undergraduate college’s philosophy department: How does a philosopher treat constipation? [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
Hasta la vista, AIG, ATLA, “earwigging,” Bernie Law, contingent commissions, Dick Scruggs, Eliot Spitzer, Eric Dinallo, the FAIR Act, GilbertHeinz; Hank Greenberg, John Garamendi, junk faxes, Mel Weiss, PHICO, Ramani Ayer, Reliance, Royal, Sears Tower, 70 Pine Street, the Sopranos, “wardrobe malfunctions,” W.R. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Concurrent Tech Corp., No. 08-2370 (3d Cir. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:41 pm
Thus, IBM Corp. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:09 pm
Thompson on suspicion of downloading nearly 30 GB of 100 million Capital One Financial Corp credit applications from a rented cloud data server. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:41 pm
** A Return to the Limits of In Re Tobacco II? [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Recently, the Second Circuit issued a significant Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decision construing the FOIA exemption covering law enforcement records that “would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]
