Search for: "Second Watch"
Results 201 - 220
of 21,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Clark says he represented himself at his second trial, where he was convicted, solely to prevent his counsel from conceding his guilt against his wishes. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
But so much time has been wasted obsessing over a famous guy using a fake word that it has distracted attention from another story in the news, involving an important decision made for dubious reasons that many will second-guess. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
This week saw the departure of what I believe to be the second-most relisted case of all time, Sykes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111, is now on its 12th relist, making it the second-most relisted case that I am aware of. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain, held that the policy unconstitutionally infringed applicants’ Second Amendment rights. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:45 am
The post Petitions to watch | Conference of January 5 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:05 pm
Second, the larger screen can be on all the time. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:05 pm
Fortunately, the second time worked fine. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
And welcome to the penultimate Relist Watch of 2014. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
§ 2244(b)(3), and in the context of applications to file second or successive 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 10:07 pm
Bitey watches. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:05 pm
Or you can watch the episode on YouTube: [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:05 pm
Or you can watch the episode on YouTube: [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:58 pm
I love being able to swipe up on my watch to see the Now Playing Glance, where I can play or pause, jump back 15 seconds if I missed something, or jump forward 30 seconds to skip through a commercials that I've heard many times before. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 10:57 pm
Here is actual language in a local judge's tentative ruling posted today in a case not my own:"COUNSEL, YOU TOOK A SECOND BITE AT THE APPLE WHEN THE TEACHER WAS NOT LOOKING AND YOU CAME UP WITH A WORM. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 2:14 pm
Her motion did not address a 12.5-hour time entry on September 25, 2010, for watching “48 Hours” episodes on similar spousal homicides, a 4.0-hour time entry on October 19, 2010 for watching four “48 Hours” episodes on asphyxia, or a 3.5-hour time entry on October 20, 2010 for watching these same “48 Hours” episodes a second time. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
For people who have been watching the recent North Carolina election cases like Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Also drawing their second relists this week are Manzano v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:27 pm
The first is that its activities are apt to contribute to the public welfare, being for a purpose beneficial to the community … The second is that whatever else be the scope today in Australia for the exclusion of “political objects” as charitable, the purposes and activities of Aid/Watch do not fall within any area of disqualification for reasons of contrariety between the established system of government and the general public welfare. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
That takes matters to the second area of concern Clause is seeing: the use of social media to attack the other side with commentary about parenting skills, substance abuse problems, child support, etc. [read post]
