Search for: "Supervisor #1 alleged, & #2" Results 201 - 220 of 2,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 9:47 am by Joshua Goodman
”  In order to establish a prima face case of mental disability discrimination under FEHA, a plaintiff must show that (1) she suffers from a mental disability; (2) she is otherwise qualified to do the job with or without reasonable accommodation; and (3) she was subjected to an adverse employment action because of the disability. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The operations supervisor sued, alleging adverse employment action and failure to hire based on sex. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:06 am by Adam Weinstein
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Raymond Clark (Clark) and imposed findings: (1) suspending the broker for three months and fined $6,000 for using his personal email account to communicate with a customer; (2) suspended for four months and fined $10,000 for making false statements to his firm; and (3) suspended for two months and fined $4,000 for failing to report a customer complaint to his firm. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The specifications set out in disciplinary charges filed against her included allegations that she failed to comply with her supervisor's directive to assist in cleaning an area assigned to another coworker who was absent from work. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:02 am by Ana Popovich
Two senior staff members who worked for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office have been fired, according to a November 2 article from The Texas Tribune. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 pm by BKK
Following the EEOC’s guidance, employers should (1) encourage employees to report harassment to management before it becomes severe or pervasive, (2) designate one or more individuals to receive such complaints, (3) establish clear safeguards against retaliation, (4) conduct a prompt, thorough and impartial investigation of all allegations of harassment; and (5) take appropriate action to remediate acts of harassment. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 am by Andrew Frisch
A finding of successorship involves two essential inquiries: (1) whether there is continuity of the business; and (2) did the successor know of the violations at the time it took over the business. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:37 am by Betty S.W. Graumlich
While employers may still view publicly available information in an employee or prospective employee’s social media account, HB 2081 (Virginia Code § 40.1-28.7:5) prohibits employers from requiring a current or prospective employee to: (1) disclose login information to a social media account; or (2) add an employee, supervisor or administrator to the list of contacts associated with the social media account. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:37 am by Betty S.W. Graumlich
While employers may still view publicly available information in an employee or prospective employee’s social media account, HB 2081 (Virginia Code § 40.1-28.7:5) prohibits employers from requiring a current or prospective employee to: (1) disclose login information to a social media account; or (2) add an employee, supervisor or administrator to the list of contacts associated with the social media account. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
To meet his prima facie burden that his military status was a motivating factor in his termination, the employee proffered the following evidence: (1) the proximity in time between his notice of deployment and his termination; (2) some negative comments made by EMS supervisors about his military activity; (3) the city’s failure to apprise him of his rights under USERRA; and (4) the city’s refusal to pay him for unused personal days and military leave time. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:45 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
If passed, S.B. 383 would change the definition of "employer" to do away of individual liability for managers and supervisors for discrimination, retaliation and harassment in Ohio. 2. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 9:46 am by Katharine O. Beattie
The EEOC has explained that harassment is unlawful when (1) there is enduring conduct that becomes a condition of employment and (2) the conduct is so severe or pervasive that a reasonable person would consider their work environment intimidating, hostile, or abusive. [read post]
Palo Alto County Board of Supervisors In the second case, the plaintiffs allege the Palo Alto Board of Supervisors did not have the authority to amend a zoning ordinance concerning a wind energy project. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:27 am by Jon Hyman
And let’s say the allegations are bad—that the supervisor told the plaintiff he could save her job if she “f***ed” him, after which the supervisor raped her. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:01 am by Bianca Saad
On September 1, 2020, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance called the “Sacramento County Worker Protection, Health, and Safety Act of 2020,” which contains two major components: (1) employer safety practices and protocols, and (2) supplemental paid sick leave. [read post]