Search for: "The Container Store v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Matthew Tokson
United States, it was formally abandoned in the 1967 case Warden v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm by Daniel Richman
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 237.115(1) Except as provided in KRS 527.020, nothing contained in KRS 237.110 [the general concealed carry licensing provision -EV] shall be construed to limit, restrict, or prohibit in any manner the right of a college, university, or any postsecondary education facility, including technical schools and community colleges, to control the possession of deadly weapons on any property owned or controlled by them or the right of a unit of state, city, county,… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am by LTA-Editor
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 12:03 pm by Lee Tankle
Supreme Court ruled unanimously (Justice Kagan recused herself) in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
Los Angeles, CA - A copyright infringement, trademark infringement, Lanham Act unfair competition, and section 17200 complaint was filed in United States District Court, Los Angeles, by Hong Kong based Funrise Toys, Inc. over sales of allegedly infringing toys by defendants doing business as Aahs stores. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]