Search for: "Trade Publishing Ltd" Results 201 - 220 of 1,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2020, 9:02 am by Magdaleen Jooste
” Further notes, including research on opera, the visual arts, and Latin American content, will be published here. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
The court held that the AI-generated work is protectable by copyright law since it is as a work of legal entities.Eleonora Rosati discussed the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Response Clothing Ltd v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd case. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If so, they may publish if they know they're protected by the "actual malice" standard, but refrain from publishing if they are subject to the negligence standard. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:08 am
See here.March 2005, Jas Hennessy & Co. instituted a proceeding against Zhuhai Xiangmutong Trading Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
  * AIPPI Congress Report 3: Trying to resolve the global puzzle of inventor remuneration  * AIPPI Congress Report 4: Trade mark sessions come in all shapes and sizes ******************  PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE   Never Too Late 68  [week ending on Sunday 18 October] – Hedge funds, pharma patents and thorny issues: a word on IPRs following Lialda | Battistelli v EPO Enlarged Board | Flynn Pharma… [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:00 am by Cinthia Macie
Federal Trade Commission Withdraws Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
 Security company Mandiant published a report finding that the government of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) is sponsoring cyber-espionage to attack top U.S. companies. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Wilkof and Axel Nordemann, comes out from the inspiring Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights, edited by Neil and Shamnad Bashir [published by OUP and noted by the IPKat here] published some time ago. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
* Proprietor may be unhappy because BE HAPPY is not a trade markCan one be happy with a “BE HAPPY” trade mark? [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
| Unregistered designs for eXreme storage | Academic publishing houses lose appeal against Delhi University & photocopy shop | GS Media finds its first application in Germany | Monday Miscellaneous | Part 36 offers in the IP Enterprise CourtNever Too Late 126 [week ending on Sunday 11 December] | Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
Katfriend Gill Grassie (Brodies LLP) discusses the matter of Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book ReviewsSpecialKat Hayleigh Bosher announces the… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:24 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Do check this article out (44 pages).In the case of Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] UKSC 44, the UK Supreme Court dealt with the law pertaining to whether “without prejudice” communications during negotiations would form a part of factual matrix that is relevant extrinsic aid to contract interpretation. [read post]