Search for: "USA v. REAL PROPERTY" Results 201 - 220 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
 C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (click here for details of the General Court's decision and here for the grounds of appeal). [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
“Net asset value is generally the standard applicable in evaluating . . . real estate and investment holding companies” (Matter of Blake v Blake Agency, 107 AD2d 139 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Trademark law does provide effective protection against grey market goods, but this protection is curtailed in several respects that explains why some companies have turned to the importation provisions of the Copyright Act.1 Perhaps most importantly, trademark law does not prohibit unauthorized importation of goods that had been manufactured by a foreign subsidiary of a US company.2 Whether overlap between copyright and trademark law creates concerns is an interesting academic question.3 Whether it… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Trademark law does provide effective protection against grey market goods, but this protection is curtailed in several respects that explains why some companies have turned to the importation provisions of the Copyright Act.1 Perhaps most importantly, trademark law does not prohibit unauthorized importation of goods that had been manufactured by a foreign subsidiary of a US company.2 Whether overlap between copyright and trademark law creates concerns is an interesting academic question.3 Whether it… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am by admin
Alon, USA, LP was the seventh-largest DFW-area judgment rendered in 2011. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
The fallout from the BMG v Cox case in the USA continues, with a court denying ISP Grande Communications the benefit of safe harbour protection in a case brought by the Recording Industry Association Of America (RIAA). [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am by Eleonora Rosati
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some… [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
Trump tried to rewrite history in real time, pushing the fiction that left-wing agitators were to blame for the violence on Jan. 6. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:07 pm by Brian M. Krause
The Illinois Supreme Court in USA I Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung GmbH & Cie v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:48 am by Stefanie Levine
  Filed March 8, 2011, by Sunflex USA. (11)     95/000,620 (paper filed) – U.S. [read post]