Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers "
Results 201 - 220
of 906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 1:57 pm
Following the June 9, 2021 joint announcement (previously discussed on this blog)[1] by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (together Agencies) that they intended to revise the WOTUS rule, additional significant developments have occurred. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:12 pm
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2781970 “The State of New Jersey, the Borough of Harvey Cedars, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers were all preparing for an event like Hurricane Sandy years before the 2012 super-storm made landfall along the Mid-Atlantic coast. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers are trying to make good on Trump’s promise. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:58 am
Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Action 04-02091 (HHK), 2008 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm
Intervenor Defendant-Appellant Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), a phosphate mining company engaged in significant operations in Hardee County, Florida, appealed the order by the district court remanding a mining-permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) back to the agency and further enjoining Mosaic from conducting operations approved in that permit. [read post]
12 May 2017, 11:09 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 194 DAPL Reply re Vance Resp to Ct Order 195 SRST Opp to ACOE & DAPL Mtns for Partial Sum Judg 198 Consol Reply to Motion to Amend Complaint 198 CRST Motion to Extend Time 200 SRST Reply to Motion to Amend Complaint 201 ACOE Reply in Support of Mtn Partial Summ Judg re SRST 203 DAPL Reply in Support of ACOE Cross-Mtn for Partial Summ Judgment 205 Opinion re DAPL Mtn for Protective Order 205 Order re DAPL… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
But to destroy wetlands it needed a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:44 am
Army Corps of Engineers extended for a second time, until November 14, the public comment period on the proposed Clean Water Protection rule -- i.e. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Army Corps of Engineers’ redefinition of the regulatory term, “Waters of the United States” (the WOTUS rule). [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
April 5 is the date of the first hearing for the many parties involved in a federal court challenge to a final rule posted this past December from EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers defining the d“waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the 1972 Clean Water Act. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:02 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, which operates nationwide), the federal role in water management is more direct and can be especially controversial during times of drought, when multiple users compete for water. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:24 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) (531 U.S. 159 (2001)) and Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Army Corps of Engineers liable under the Tucker Act for flood damage to the Plaintiffs’ properties. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Army Corps of Engineers liable under the Tucker Act for flood damage to the Plaintiffs’ properties. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, No. 2:08-cv-1316-GEB-CMK, 2009 WL 497575 (E.D.Cal. [read post]
