Search for: "United States v. Two Firearms Seized"
Results 201 - 220
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
That message comes from Judge Stephan Reinhardt of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:58 pm
V. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
US, No. 06-5301 Dismissal of claim for the return of cash that was seized and forfeited in connection with plaintiff's arrest for violating currency reporting laws is affirmed as the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is barred by sovereign immunity. . .U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 27, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
As to his sentence, Hernandez argues the trial court should have stayed two of his sentences under Penal Code section 654.[ 2 ] He contends the section 654 stay requirement must be applied to (1) one of two convictions for firearm possession by a felon, and (2) a burglary conviction as incidental to an assault conviction. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/835705.opn.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Srivastava, No. 074386 Order suppressing evidence seized by federal officers from residence and medical offices of doctor-plaintiff is vacated and remanded where: 1) the evidence suppressed was constitutionally seized and within the scope of the search warrants; and 2) the court's blanket suppression of all seized evidence was erroneous. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Jordan had, on nine separate occasions, used a counterfeit badge and his United States Marshal credentials to pose as an on-duty U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm
This month, the Attorney General has asked the United States Supreme Court to overturn the First Circuit Court of Appeals’ reasoning and decision in an 2013 appeal before the High Court, United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Butler, Medford OR) United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:31 am
Individuals on the Selectee List are allowed to board commercial airplanes traveling to or within the United States, but they must undergo enhanced security screening before doing so. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Briggs (1986) in denying the officers qualified immunity, and whether Malley and United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
District court's denial of motion to suppress the evidence seized after search of the boat is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) defendants did not consent to the search; and 2) the district court erred in its alternative determination that the search met the requirements of a border search. [read post]
