Search for: "United States v. Two Firearms Seized"
Results 201 - 220
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
No Miranda warnings were given to either the defendant or the driver before the crack cocaine was seized. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64958-2.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:54 am
The Supreme Court held in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/835705.opn.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/828687.no1.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
[They] seized numerous items, including . . . six computers, multiple USB thumb drives, USB cables, a Sony Playstation, two digital cameras, multiple external hard drives, a cassette recorder, two USB cameras, numerous compact discs, a pair of handcuffs, condoms, three marijuana pipes, a handgun, ammunition, and over seventy grams of marijuana. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
As to his sentence, Hernandez argues the trial court should have stayed two of his sentences under Penal Code section 654.[ 2 ] He contends the section 654 stay requirement must be applied to (1) one of two convictions for firearm possession by a felon, and (2) a burglary conviction as incidental to an assault conviction. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
Section 2384 provides as follows: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
