Search for: "Unknown Claimants" Results 201 - 220 of 826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am by INFORRM
The short message of this case is to reinforce the point that Mr Justice Tugendhat made in Terry v Persons Unknown - the court will, in each privacy case, need to be properly satisfied that the interests of the public in open justice have been properly taken into account in re [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:56 am
Even though Madoff victims previously filed a securities class action lawsuit against Banco Santander and other parties in the Southern District of Florida (as discussed here), a different group of claimants has now filed a separate lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against substantially the same set of defendants. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
But an Order will limit the extent to which the private lives of the Claimant and others are interfered with notwithstanding that it identifies the Claimant. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 11:55 am by vforberger
At her hearing, she explained that she did not know how to respond to a hypothetical job offer for which the relative safety of that hypothetical job was unknown. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:16 pm by vforberger
In addition, the exact nature and scope of this data is unknown, as this data is simply not available to the public and the Advisory Council apparently does not ask for it. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
  In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm by Daniel Harawa
The FTCA judgment bar provides: The judgment in an action under section 1346(b) of this title shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee of the government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Andres
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
A lot of this has to do with the fear of the unknown. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:27 am by SJM
The tenancy was granted by Ms McD’s parents in breach of the terms and conditions of a mortgage agreement with Capital Homes Ltd (they had not sought the company’s permission to let the property to a family member and they were prohibited under the agreement from letting to a social security claimant). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
If the words would be so understood by such people it is not necessary for the claimant to prove that there were in fact such people, who read the offending words; so an individual defamed by name in Cornwall has a cause of action even if he was unknown in that county at the time of publication [15](2). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
It can also be provided by a national court, as long as individual claimants are allowed to choose the court of their liking. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
 Mr Justice Tugendhat refused the claimant’s application for such an order and the claimant was named as Bernard Gray, a businessman and writer. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 7:56 pm by Ted Smith
”  Rarely does the judge inform the claimant that the claimant won the case. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Each claimant pleads individual facts and any damages payable are tailored accordingly. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
 Why they did not prosecute the claimant for fraud is unknown. [read post]