Search for: "Wal-Mart, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 12:22 pm
If measured, please report total amount of solid waste generated from the facilities that produce your product(s) for  Wal-Mart Inc for the most recent year measured. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:39 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., an appeal heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, involved a plaintiff who went to a big box retail store ("defendant") along with her brother and son. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:15 pm
Wal-Mart, Inc. (9th Cir. 2007) 509 F.3d 1168 (one of very few pending cases to have an extensive wikipedia page) is no longer good law; the 9th Circuit is reviewing it en banc. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is mobilizing its store managers and department supervisors around the country to warn that if Democrats win power in November, they’ll likely change federal law to make it easier for workers to unionize companies — including Wal-Mart. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:04 am by Francesca Robertson
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, is currently facing a vast gender-discrimination lawsuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:55 pm
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has agreed to pay almost one (1) million dollars to settle a lawsuit, filed by the state of New Jersey, which alleged that the world’s biggest seller of retail goods was selling infant formula and non-prescription drugs after their expiration dates. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:50 pm
"Maryland will drop Wal-Mart law fight; Move ends battle over health care": The Baltimore Sun today contains an article that begins, "Maryland won't challenge a federal court decision striking down the state's 'Fair Share' health care act, ending a two-year effort to force Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to pay more for employee health care, Attorney General Douglas F. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:21 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Chinese Daily News, Inc., 623 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2010), and remanded it “for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]