Search for: "William D Ing"
Results 201 - 220
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
And since the Facebook policy bans "[d]enying or distorting information about the Holocaust,"[70] the scope of such potential restrictions could be quite broad and quite vague. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:20 pm
Here is my new essay on Law360, with the story of Stefan Passantino's representation of Cassidy Hutchinson as a cautionary tale for other lawyers. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Adler's kind invitation, I'd like to elaborate, focusing on the objections that the opinion: rests on a historical error, offers only ad hoc ways to distinguish abortion from other unenumerated rights, and forecloses even a narrow constitutional right to life-saving abortions. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In May 2019, Attorney General William Barr tapped Connecticut’s U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
No excuse is needed to celebrate the civil rights icon Rev. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:28 am
Jeanne Shaheen, when announcing her support for the bill, named Guillén specifically as “underscor[ing] the need for a robust response. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 2400, 2442 (2019) (Gorsuch, J., concurring in the judgment) (the proper approach to legal interpretation is “elucidat[ing] the law’s original public meaning”). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Presumption of joint bank account survivorship rebuttable ESTATE OF DEFRANKIN THE MATTER OF THEESTATE OF AURELIA DEFRANK,DECEASED.November 15, 2013 Before Judges Parrillo, Harris and Guadagno.On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Probate Part, Mercer County, Docket No. 09-01870.The opinion of the court was delivered byPARRILLO, P.J.A.D.Plaintiff Lorraine Rubaltelli appeals from the April 12, 2012 grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Diane… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
On February 7, a three-judge panel—Judges William C. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[12] Meanwhile, a New Hampshire newspaper blamed "[t]raitors in the old lady's Cabinet" for "supply[ing] the conspirators with the means of insurrection from the public arsenals," such that "General Scott [was] hampered in his measures to defend the capital. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Topco Associates, when the Supreme Court extolled the merits of the per se rule and openly mocked the idea of “leav[ing] courts free to ramble through the wilds of economic theory . . .. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
§ 1391(d), confirmed that where a corporation “resides” is where it is incorporated. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
We are very pleased to announce Lawfare‘s first e-book, Lawfare on the National Defense Authorization Acts, which is now available in Kindle format on Amazon for $4.99. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:41 pm
Rather than listening to his staff, however, Trump hired a new legal team—referred to by former Attorney General William Barr as the “clown car”—to carry out his election fraud claims in court. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
As I indicated in my first post, in this second post I explore the ramifications of these decisions, “plac[ing] them in the context of the changes in the makeup of the bench and … consider[ing] the role ‘public controversy’ plays in assessing judicial conduct. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
(Id.)D. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
The below is the HTML text of the original opinion in the Kimble v. [read post]
