Search for: "Barnett v. York" Results 221 - 240 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  “The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
But the retaliation claims failed nonetheless because no reasonable jury could find that the employer was aware of the father’s prior protected activity—a discrimination claim filed against his previous employer (Barnett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by Jake McGowan
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am by Barry Barnett
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 6:11 am by David Bernstein
New York: Economic Regulation on Trial. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 The Times of Malta has a piece entitled Criminal libel is history as new media law comes into force United States Summer Zevros’ defamation case against President has proceeded to its initial evidence gathering stage following the New York Appeals court denying a motion to stay the case filed [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, Third Department  Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that  he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father             In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021)  petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]