Search for: "Costco Wholesale Corp." Results 221 - 240 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 am by Richard Hunt
Costco Wholesale Corporation, 2021 WL 2821140 (S.D. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Lyle Denniston
  The division came about since Justice Elena Kagan was recused from the case – Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
A recent decision by a three-judge panel of the National Relations Board, addressing the social media policies of Costco Wholesale Corp. held that the company’s social media policy violated its employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:00 pm by Cookson Beecher
Board members, who were instrumental in the development of the EFI Standards, include representatives from Costco Wholesale Corp., Consumer Federation of America, United Farm Workers, Andrew and Williamson Fresh Produce International, Farmworker Justice, Oxfam America, and Bon Appetit Management Co. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:51 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Costco Wholesale Corporation, 657 F.3d 970, 982-84 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:03 am by My name
On September 7, 2012, the NLRB issued its first decision concerning a specific employer's social media policy, determining that Costco Wholesale Corp.'s policy, which prohibited employees from electronically posting statements that "damage the Company . . . or damage any person's reputation" was impermissible under the NLRA as an unlawful restraint on protected concerted activity rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm by Richard Hunt
Costco Wholesale Corporation, 2020 WL 6561440 (S.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:47 am
Siltronic, the city's top non-wholesale customer, paid $.003227 a gallon -- again, five times what Carollo paid. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Mark Theodore
  In Costco Wholesale Corp. 358 NLRB No. 106 (September 7, 2012).pdf the Board found some provisions of the employer’s handbook to be violative of the Act. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Costco Wholesale Corp, a California appeals court decision which held that, under California law and the FLSA, vacation hours “paid but not worked, as well as total hours worked, can properly be included in the divisor when setting the regular rate” with regard to a productivity bonus based on hours compensated because such hours “contributed to the bonus. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:03 pm by Adriene Cooper
  The session will be moderated by Craig Wilson, vice president and GMM for Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:00 am
Costco Wholesale Corp., 171 Cal.App.4th 1, 22  (Feb. 11, 2009) (same). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Further, in his view, the provision at issue here was more akin to the rule found lawful in Costco Wholesale Corp. requiring “appropriate business decorum” in communicating with others. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
Crystal Import Corp (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Safe Skies - ITC decides not to review initial determination in certain dual access locks (337-TA-689) (ITC 377 Law Blog) Toyota - In hybrid patent case, Toyota argues preclusion to avoid exclusion (Green Patent Blog)   US Copyright The impact of eBay on injunctive relief in copyright cases (Copyrights & Campaigns) The Copyright Act’s registration requirement no longer… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:58 am by Zak Gowen
In a joint stipulation filed by Costco Wholesale Corp. and the defendants, including Visa Inc., Mastercard Inc., Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co., the parties told the court that the wholesale retailer “fully settled all of its claims against all of the defendants” but did not disclose details of the deal. . . . [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:23 am by Anna Armstrong
In a joint stipulation filed by Costco Wholesale Corp. and the defendants, including Visa Inc., Mastercard Inc., Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co., the parties told the court that the wholesale retailer “fully settled all of its claims against all of the defendants” but did not disclose details of the deal. . . . [read post]