Search for: "D. STRICKLAND"
Results 221 - 240
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2007, 9:33 am
Doe (D. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
§ 2254(d). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:29 pm
It doesn't say she'd beef up staffing to process appeals faster, or what she'll do to punish agencies that abuse the appellate process. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
Perez, No. 8:02CR296, 2010 WL 4643033, at *2 (D. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 6:42 pm
At an Iowa town hall meeting, Obama addressed how he'd create a better educated workforce. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:41 am
It’s been reintroduced as S. 1324 by Senators Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., David Vitter, R-La., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:28 pm
Justice Scalia took issue with the Court’s “smuggling” the Strickland standard into a case in which, in his view, it does not apply. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The court focused on the familiar ineffective assistance test in Strickland v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated AEDPA § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:13 am
Against this backdrop, and recalling its two-prong ineffective assistance test as set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
After Parker, should Darden claims now be regarded as falling into the same super-high deference category as Jackson and Strickland claims? [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Texas, a capital defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
In short, the court makes much of Strickland’s first prong, the deficiency of counsel’s performance, while giving relatively short shrift to the question of how Moore was prejudiced by it. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 8:32 pm
But Ted Strickland commuted a sentence when the Board said not to and refused to commute one when the Board said he should. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:40 am
Evans, Associate Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law SchoolRussell Frackman, Partner, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPJonathan D. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Strickland. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Strickland. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the standard… [read post]
