Search for: "DOES 1-116"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 12:21 am
Regarding the appellant's auxiliary request for oral proceedings submitted with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal (see page 1, second paragraph), it is clear from the mandatory wording of Article 116(1) EPC that a party which requests oral proceedings is in principle entitled to such proceedings (see for example T 19/87 of 16 April 1987, OJ EPO 1988, 268). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
The wording of Art. 27 para. 1 Brussels I Regulation does not provide for an exception in cases where the court second seised has exclusive jurisdiction under Art. 22 Brussel I Regulation. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1968), Katz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:38 am
However, the plaintiff had the capacity to commence this action on his mother’s behalf as her attorney-in-fact pursuant to the power of attorney (see Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d 726, 726). [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:56 pm
Roper, 116 Ill. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Plus, it only accounted $1 million for state penalties that could easily pile up to more than $1 billion. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
What does this new announcement mean? [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
S. 1 (1949). [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:11 pm
References 1. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
But this does not imply an exception to Rule 52(a) for underlying factual disputes. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:21 pm
Eq. 1, 4 (E. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 12:15 am
" (pp. 116-17.) [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Gary Herbert (R), the bill will take effect July 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:23 pm
If so, does it justify inordinate delay? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:57 pm
§ 116 (1988). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
Similarly, the number of qualified offerings dropped from 57 in 1998 to 1 in 2011. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 3:30 am
” (P. 1.) [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:20 pm
The presence of such clauses does not, however, guarantee the elimination of interlocutory or adjectival contests concerning the law which will govern, and the forum or mode of dispute resolution that will apply, to the determination of an international sporting dispute. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:06 pm
Article 124(3)(a)(iii) CRR extends the possibilities to be eligible to the preferential risk weight treatment for retail immovable property under Article 125(1) CRR for exposures which are still under construction, where any of the following conditions are met: The immovable property does not have more than four residential housing units and will be the primary residence of the obligor and the lending to the natural person is not indirectly financing ADC exposures. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
See HOLDSWORTH, supra, at 116-17. [read post]
