Search for: "DOES 1-98 "
Results 221 - 240
of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2008, 6:31 am
(b) A person who is injured by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action for treble damages.As added by P.L.98-2004, SEC.22.The Pfenninger opinion gives a good description of how IC 34-52-1-1 operates at pages 13 - 14 of the opinion. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
This decision was confirmed in subsequent decisions of the boards of appeal, for example T 445/98 [3] and T 371/92 [3.2, 3.4-5]. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
When assembled, the bone incision block 1 can be placed (e.g., screwed) onto the bone at any point near the resection area. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:24 am
Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale, on the concepts of ‘civil and commercial matters’ and ‘administrative matters’ under Article 1 Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The relevant passages in decision G 1/98 read as follows: “In contrast, a plant defined by single recombinant DNA sequences is not an individual plant grouping to which an entire constitution can be attributed […]. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
In the present case, however, the claimed amounts represent a continuum of a numerical range of values which does not correspond to distinctive alternative embodiments. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:18 am
On the interpretation of Directive 98/84 ... on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional accessQ.1 Illicit Device(a) Where a conditional access device is made by or with the consent of a service provider and sold subject to a limited authorisation to use the device only to gain access to the protected service in particular circumstances, does that device become an "illicit device" within the meaning of Art. 2(e) of Directive… [read post]
16 May 2021, 5:39 pm
A judge’s politics and scientific acumen may be the basis for an order to accept a vaccine no matter what a mature child says or does. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
Ct. 331, 98 L. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Furthermore, the amendment to claim 1 merely involves a disclaimer for the value not enjoying the priority of document D0 and, with respect to the decision under appeal, does not raise issues which the Board or the other parties cannot reasonably be expected to deal with without adjournment of the OPs. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:30 am
Here's what the legislature's website says happened to the rest of the pro-employee bills (hint: unless it says it was presented to the Governor or the Governor signed it, it's dead):Overtime: HB 455 - Labor RegulationsGeneral Bill by CampbellLabor Regulations: Designates act as "Florida Overtime Act of 2015"; revises number of hours of labor that comprise legal day's work; revises rates of overtime compensation for labor performed in excess of certain of hours of… [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:01 am
" See 1 Wayne R. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:03 pm
Extrapolated over a 10-year period, that adds up to a cost of $1-1.8 billion for the industry, assuming a steady adoption rate. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
Josh Marshall does so with this silly plagiarism stuff, in pseudo attacking Hilary Clinton for using a line similar to something Bill Clinton said in 1992: Just to be 100% clear, there's nothing in the least wrong with this. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In particular, the EPC does not define the points in time at which the pending status of an application begins and ends in all possible situations. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
The fact that the legislature established this structure as a useful means to address the problem of auditor independence does not necessarily save it. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm
The Opposition Division admitted into the proceedings late-filed documents D9(=WO 98/22367 A) and D14(=DE 646 326 A) and held that claim 1 of the then main request (patent as granted) and of the then first to sixth auxiliary requests did not involve inventive step pursuant to Article 56 EPC starting from D9 as closest prior art in combination with the teaching of D14.III. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 1:46 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 11:48 am
When does a red rose look too much like a red rose? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
¶ 98. [read post]
